MOTTO

Así que: “…se adquiere un campo, un pedazo de tierra, se da la vuelta a ese pedazo de tierra, en ese primer recorrido del nuevo pedazo de tierra no se lleva a nadie, se protege uno, sigue su camino, se traza un pequeño círculo, destruir, extinguirlo todo, hacer que no haya sucedido, a los curiosos su propia saliva en el rostro, nada de comunicaciones, nada de descubrimientos: éstos se hacen para comunicarlos: se ha llegado a un punto en que ya no se tienen puntos de referencia para trazar los límites: se levanta un alto muro, se construye cada vez más alto, se acelera el muro, se sacrifica casi todo por la construcción de ese muro, finalmente se sacrifica uno mismo, la idea; el muro se ha hecho tan alto que no se puede tener ya ninguna relación,…”...

Thomas Bernhard, In der Höhe. Rettungsversuch, Unsinn, 1959 (Sáenz, 1992).

19.5.11

Modos del ser: Lenguaje, Pensamiento, Realidad: Formal Onntology & Conceptual Realism.

Chapter 1 Formal Ontology and Conceptual Realism

Summary and Concluding Remarks

Metaphysics consists of the separate disciplines of ontology and cosmology, each with their respective methodologies.

Formal ontology connects logical categories -especially the categories involved in predication- with ontological categories.

The goal of a formal ontology is the construction of a lingua philosophica, or characteristica universalis, as explicated in terms of an ars combinatoria and a calculus ratiocinator as part of a formal theory of predication.

A formal ontology should serve as the framework of a characteristica realis, and hence as the basis of a formal approach to science and cosmology. It should also serve as a framework for our commonsense understanding of the world.

The central feature of a formal ontology is how it represents the nexus of predication, which depends on what theory of universals it assumes.

The three main theories of universals are nominalism, conceptuallism, and (logical or natural) realism.

The analysis of the fundamental forms of predication of a formal ontology may be directed upon the structure of reality or upon the structure of thought.

Natural realism, and in particular Aristotle’s ontology, is directed upon the structure of the natural world, and the preeminent mode of being is that of concrete individual things, or primary substances. There are two major forms of natural realism, moderate realism and modal moderate realism.

Aristotle’s moderate natural realism has two types of predication: predication of species and genera (natural kinds), and predication of properties and relations.

Kant’s and Husserl’s categorial analyses, unlike Aristotle’s, are directed upon the structure of thought and experience rather than upon the structure of reality. The categories function on this account to articulate the logical forms of judgments and not as the general causes or grounds of concrete being.

Husserl’s formal ontology is based on a transcendental logic in which the laws and rules of logic are justified in terms of subjective analyses of presumed a priori structures that provide the evidence for the objective versions of those laws and rules.

There are two problems regarding the completeness of a formal ontology: first, the problem of the completeness of the categories of an ontology, and second, the problem of the completeness of the deductive laws that are based on those categories.

Set theory provides only an external semantics for a formal ontology, unless that ontology is set theory itself, which has no nexus of predication, and hence strictly speaking is not a formal ontology. An incompleteness theorem for a formal ontology based a set-theoretic semantics need not show that the ontology is incomplete with respect to an internal semantics. In particular, sometimes general models are a better repesentation of a formal ontology’s internal semantics than are so-called “standard” models.

Conceptual realism is a formal ontology framed within the context of a naturalistic epistemology and a naturalistic approach to the relations between language, thought, and reality as based on our scientific knowledge of the world.

Conceptual realism is based on a conceptualist account of the speech and mental acts that underlie reference and predication. It is directed in that regard primarily upon the structure of thought. But, because its methodology is based on a linguistic and logical analysis of our speech and mental acts, it is not committed to a phenomenological reduction of those acts. Nor does it preclude such a reduction.

Conceptual realism contains both a natural realism and an intensional realism, each of which can be developed as separate subsystems that are compatible within the larger framework, one containing a modern form of Aristotelian essentialism, and the other containing a modern counterpart of Platonism based on the intensional contents of our speech and mental acts.

Nino B. Cocchiarella - SYNTHESE LIBRARY 339 Formal Ontology and Conceptual Realism - Springer - 2007